Cycling Infrastructure Costs: A Comparative Analysis of Segregated Cycle Lanes and Smart Bike Parking Networks

A reference report examining capital costs, deployment timescales, and financial sustainability across two approaches to cycling investment, drawing on UK and European benchmarks.

Abstract:

This report presents a comparative cost analysis of two approaches to cycling infrastructure investment: segregated cycle lanes and secure bike parking facilities. Drawing on UK Department for Transport data, European Cyclists' Federation benchmarks, and project-level cost evidence, we examine capital costs, deployment timescales, and long-term financial sustainability across both infrastructure types.

Our analysis reveals significant cost differentials. Fully segregated cycle lanes in the UK cost £1.15-1.45 million per kilometre, with complex European projects reaching €12 million per kilometre. Secure bike parking, by contrast, can be delivered for £500-2,000 per space - meaning equivalent investment yields either sub-kilometre route sections or hundreds of parking spaces across multiple locations.

We identify a historical limitation in parking infrastructure: unlike cycle lanes, which inherently form connected networks, parking facilities have traditionally operated as isolated assets, limiting their strategic value. However, we find that modern smart management platforms can address this gap. For approximately £1,000-2,000 per facility, these systems create networked parking infrastructure with unified access, centralised monitoring, and integration with broader transport systems.

The report further notes that secure parking generates ongoing revenue through user subscriptions (£39-500 per space annually depending on facility type), enabling operational self-sustainability - a characteristic absent from cycle lane infrastructure.

We conclude that smart bike parking networks represent a cost-effective complement to route-based cycling investment, particularly in contexts where budgets are constrained or where existing infrastructure (quiet streets, low-traffic neighbourhoods, towpaths) provides adequate routes but secure destination parking is lacking.

Download the full report below.